Abstract
Compactifying the SM down to 3D or 2D one may obtain AdS vacua depending on the neutrino mass spectrum. It has been recently shown that, by insisting in the absence of these vacua, as suggested by Weak Gravity Conjecture (WGC) arguments, intriguing constraints on the value of the lightest neutrino mass and the 4D cosmological constant are obtained. For fixed Yukawa coupling one also obtains an upper bound on the EW scale 〈H〉≲Λ41/4/Yνi, where Λ4 is the 4D cosmological constant and Yνi the Yukawa coupling of the lightest (Dirac) neutrino. This bound may lead to a reassessment of the gauge hierarchy problem. In this letter, following the same line of arguments, we point out that the SM without a Higgs field would give rise to new AdS lower dimensional vacua. Absence of latter would require the very existence of the SM Higgs. Furthermore one can derive a lower bound on the Higgs vev 〈H〉≳ΛQCD which is required by the absence of AdS vacua in lower dimensions. The lowest number of quark/lepton generations in which this need for a Higgs applies is three, giving a justification for family replication. We also reassess the connection between the EW scale, neutrino masses and the c.c. in this approach. The EW fine-tuning is here related to the proximity between the c.c. scale Λ41/4 and the lightest neutrino mass mνi by the expression ΔHH≲(aΛ41/4−mνi)mνi. We emphasize that all the above results rely on the assumption of the stability of the AdS SM vacua found.
Highlights
Compactifying the SM down to 3D or 2D one may obtain AdS vacua depending on the neutrino mass spectrum
One can derive a lower bound on the Higgs vev H ΛQCD which is required by the absence of AdS vacua in lower dimensions
We reassess the connection between the EW scale, neutrino masses and the c.c. in this approach
Summary
Let us consider first the fermion and gauge boson content of the SM (plus the graviton) with ng quark/lepton generations. Inspired by what happens in the Standard Model in the zero quark-mass limit [15] we will estimate the masses for the charged pseudo-Goldstones as m2ij (αem/4π)Λ2QCD In addition to these electromagnetic contributions, there are one-loop corrections from W, Z exchange, which affect in general to all pseudo-Goldstone bosons, neutral and charged. Let us explain in more detail why formula 2.3 helps us predicting the presence of an AdS minima, even though pseudo-Goldstone bosons have mass In this formula we must include as light degrees of freedom those particles whose masses are lower than the QCD threshold because their contribution will become relevant before the QCD transition.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have