The findings of the Disability Royal Commission: the relevance for people with intellectual disabilities in rural areas

Abstract

People living in rural areas of Australia are significantly disadvantaged, compared to metropolitan dwelling peers, in accessing basic support services. Australians with intellectual disabilities living in rural areas are at specific risk of further disadvantage. This article examines the findings and recommendations of the Disability Royal Commission through the lens of rurality. A frequency analysis of key words relating to rurality indicated an interesting trend in relation to the term “remote” which had a higher count rate than either “regional” or “rural”. This finding may indicate that issues from non-remote rural locations were less well represented. The Final Report included many examples from people with intellectual disabilities or their carers regarding the lack of vital services in rural areas, and specifically highlighted the need to introduce a “provider of last resort”. Problems with support were also identified following domestic violence and rape, and concerns noted regarding the provision of public transport in rural areas. The Final Report contains 222 recommendations, of which 11 contained a specific focus addressing a rural issue, and these are briefly discussed. It is unfortunate that, in some key support areas, there appear to be an implicit expectation that the remaining 200+ recommendations will all apply evenly across Australia, irrespective of location. Nonetheless, the Disability Royal Commission should be commended for their inclusive approach to involving people with disabilities living in rural areas which led to the reporting from rural people with intellectual disabilities and their carers regarding the issues that they have faced.