Abstract
There are, as Ⅰ have come to believe, assets of the EU which help it become-but also shortcomings which stand in the way of it becoming-an international actor of the first order. After revealing the reasons for this ambivalence in assessing the EU, Ⅰ will try to answer the question: Why is the EU unable to speak with ”one voice” in foreign and security affairs at the present time? My answer is as follows: The EU is not yet able to act as an international actor, because precisely some functions are not yet ”communitarized,” in contrast, for instance, to monetary policy. These functions still belong to the national prerogatives of the member states. That is why the EU is only a strictly handicapped international actor at the moment. This brings me to the very character of the EU: It does not by any means intend to become a state, which, by definition, would have a monopoly on power in a human community. The EU is only entrusted with special ”limited authorities,” conferred on it by the member states. This ”limited authorization” is, according to my interpretation, the EU's ”PIN,” i.e., its secret Personal Identification Number, so to speak. This unique character of the EU is hard to understand for advocates and opponents of the EU alike. But the PIN is, as Ⅰ see it, the code to understanding the EU's assets as well as its limits.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.