Abstract

This article critically examines the extent to which the European Public Prosecutor’s Office can be claimed to constitute a prime example of supranational criminal law. The article observes that among policymakers and commentators, the Office appears to be a hallmark of the transformation of EU criminal law from an intergovernmental paradigm to a strong federal and supranational polity. The article discusses the scope, nature and limits to the powers of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, as well as its operating structure in light of Article 86 TFEU and the recently adopted EPPO Regulation. It departs from the basic assumption that the EPPO stands in the midst of supranationalism and intergovernmentalism. Whilst the EPPO is envisaged to be independent of the Member States, the Office’s complicated, multifaceted and vertical structure means that Member States are able to direct, to some extent, its activities. The article argues, however, that a general assessment of the Office’s operational and strategic direction (where its operational activities are managed and supervised by centralized ‘European’ prosecutors), and the type (direct criminal enforcement powers) of powers it has makes it distinctive as the most ‘integrated’ and ‘supranational’ EU agency.

Highlights

  • The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), which will commence its operation in the very near future, appears to be an emblem for the transformation of EU criminalOberg law from an intergovernmental paradigm to a strong supranational polity

  • This article has critically analysed the extent to which the EPPO can be claimed to constitute a paradigmatic instance of supranational criminal law on the basis of the general ‘integration’ literature

  • It argued that the scope, type and character of the EPPO’s powers, the observation that the EPPO’s strategic management is derived from ‘supranational’ management positions and the fact that the EPPO independently is capable of enforcing PIF offences before the national courts makes it stand out as the most integrated and supranational EU agency

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), which (at this stage of writing) will commence its operation in the very near future, appears to be an emblem for the transformation of EU criminal. ) the perpetrators of, and accomplices in, offences against the Union’s financial interests’ It shall ‘exercise the functions of prosecutor in the competent courts of the Member States in relation to such offences.’[11] Whilst Article 86 TFEU does not in itself establish the EPPO, it provides the legal basis for the Council Regulation which created it.[12]. Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, [2017] OJ L 283/1

13. For a small selection of recent literature
Substantive scope of competence
41. National parliaments made this point clearly in their reasoned opinions
Nature of the EPPO’s powers
The type of powers conferred upon the EPPO
Management and operation of the EPPO
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.