Abstract
European consumers enjoy protection, if they are natural persons who act outside professional purposes and have as counterparts professionals (traders). Applying the test of the three conditions, it is possible that consumers who do not need protection to fall within the scope of the consumer protection laws. This is the reason why we are wondering about the “identity” of the European consumer.To elucidate the issue we will use a few questions, which, in a logical sequence, would be asked by any jurist more or less familiar with the matter of EU consumer protection. First, why do consumers need protection? Are they vulnerable? How are consumers protected and “identified” in cross-border contracts? Does the irrebuttable presumption of consumer vulnerability generate fair judgments?We will conclude by pointing out that EU consumer protection has reached a critical moment, when the irrebuttable presumption of consumer vulnerability generates exaggerations and, possibly, imbalances. Protective laws are used as a shield by consumers who do not actually need them, which produce results that are contrary to the purpose for which they were designed .
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.