Abstract
Although monogamy is the dominant relationship style in the Western world, there are alternative options for non-monogamous relationship dynamics. This paper works to explore how the roots of how monogamy became the dominant structure, the hidden drawbacks of monogamy, how those who assert monogamy to be compulsory hold a stigma against those who partake in other dynamics, and how this stigma can work to oppress. It also explores what those dynamics are, who participates in them, and a myriad of benefits that non-monogamous relationships can have. Overall coming to the conclusion that everyone should be able to make an informed decision, free of societal judgment, to partake in whatever dynamic they may choose.
Highlights
When it comes to deciding on our romantic relationship paths, many of us will wind up searching out a single romantic partner that we can commit to exclusively; this paper will explore why that seems to be the default, some other relationship dynamics and the stigma against these alternatives
It is worth noting that other relationship structures and dynamics are legitimate and can be just as healthy, even though they are highly stigmatized in Western society
In Western society, there is a dominating perception that monogamy should be compulsory and that any relationship that goes against monogamous ideals is immoral, depraved or shady in some way (Rothschild, 2018)
Summary
When it comes to deciding on our romantic relationship paths, many of us will wind up searching out a single romantic partner that we can commit to exclusively; this paper will explore why that seems to be the default, some other relationship dynamics and the stigma against these alternatives. Monogamy is the relationship dynamic that is most widely accepted in the Western world, and is one that relies on an ideally lifelong commitment (often marital) to a single other person (Rothschild, 2018). The inclusion of informed consent from all parties is an important distinction between polyamory and infidelity and cheating in a monogamous relationship; which Sheff (2020) notes is inherently nonconsensual and doesn’t involve discussion or negotiation from all people involved
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
