Abstract
We argued that borderline completion does not explain the completion, that the computation of border-ownership (BOWN) causes illusory signals, and that neurons activated at illusory contours represent BOWN. Although most commentaries show support to our view, they further emphasized the importance of feedback and also pointed out some examples challenging our view. The signal processing in the hierarchy and the classification of neurons are also discussed. In this reply, we explain our position on a dynamic feedback system reflecting the global configuration, and clarify our view on completion, by examining the example figures and neurophysiological data indicated in the commentaries.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
