Abstract
Recent macroeconomic analysis of interwar labor markets argues that the introduction of the eight-hour day in January 1919 amounted to a supply side shock to the economy. In the short term and in concert with a monetary contraction, it is held responsible for the slump of 1920-21. In the long term it is held to have increased the natural rate of unemployment. This paper argues that this thesis is flawed as far as the shipbuilding industry is concerned. The post-war slump was due to a negative exogenous shock to demand. The long-run employment problems which the industry faced were due to the acquisition of excess capacity as a result of the war and post-war boom and subsequent demand side problems. Copyright 1997 by Oxford University Press.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
