Abstract

The experimental value of the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) was used as a criterion for comparing different photomultiplier tubes and for assessing the relative merits of pulse-counting and dc measurement. For tubes with S-11 and S-20 photocathodes at room temperature, no significant difference was found between pulse-counting and dc methods. When different tubes were compared, other factors being equal, those with smaller cathodes gave higher S/N values. A comparison was also made between a cooled S-1 cathode photomultiplier tube and a p-i-n photodiode at room temperature. The photomultiplier tube was found to have a S/N many times higher than the photodiode.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.