The effects of the specific adsorption of anion on the reactivity of the Ru(0001) surface towards CO adsorption and oxidation: in situ FTIRS studies

Abstract

The dynamics of adsorption and oxidation of CO on Ru(0001) electrode in sulfuric acid solution have been studied using in situ FTIR spectroscopy under potential control and at open circuit, the latter at 20 and 55 degrees C. The in situ IR data show clearly that the bisulfate anion adsorbs on the Ru(0001) surface over the potential range from -200 mV to 350 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl) at 20 degrees C in the absence and presence of adsorbed CO; however, increasing the temperature to 55 degrees C and/or increasing the concentration of dissolved O(2) reduces the bisulfate adsorption. The formation of surface (hydro-) oxide at higher potentials replaces the bisulfate adsorbates. Both linear (CO(L)) and three-fold hollow bonded CO (CO(H)) adsorbates were produced following CO adsorption at Ru(0001) in H(2)SO(4), as was observed in our previous studies in HClO(4). However, the amount of adsorbed CO observed in H(2)SO(4) was ca. 10% less than that in HClO(4); in addition, the CO(L) and CO(H) frequencies were higher in H(2)SO(4), and the onset potential for CO(ads) oxidation 25 mV lower. These new results are interpreted in terms of a model in which the adsorbed bisulfate weakens the CO adlayer, allowing the active Ru oxide layer to form at lower potentials. Significantly different results were observed at open circuit in H(2)SO(4) compared both to the data under potential control and to our earlier data in HClO(4), and these observations were rationalized in terms of the adsorbed HSO(4)(-) anions (pre-adsorbed at -200 mV) inhibiting the oxidation of the surface at open circuit (after stepping from the initial potential of -200 mV), as the latter was no longer driven by the imposed electrochemical potential but via chemical oxidation by trace dissolved O(2). Results from experiments at open circuit at 55 degrees C and using oxygen-saturated H(2)SO(4) supported this model. The difference in Ru surface chemistry between imposed electrochemical control and chemical control has potential implications with respect to fuel cell electrocatalysis.