Abstract

Given the posterior chain configuration, it is anticipated that tibial positioning influences hamstring recruitment; medial hamstrings should be more activated during medial rotation, while lateral hamstrings should be more activated during lateral rotation. However, most studies showing this pattern have focused on concentric or isometric strength, leaving the influence on eccentric strength fairly unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the electromyographic response of the hamstring muscles during Nordic hamstring exercises in three leg positions: internal rotation, external rotation, and neutral. This study encompassed a randomized crossover study and used surface electromyography to analyze the activity of the biceps femoris and semitendinosus muscles during the Nordic hamstring exercise, in the three positions. Results indicated no statistically significant differences in muscle activation between positions or sides (p > 0.05), though small effect sizes were observed for the biceps femoris in different positions (η2 = 0.01–0.03). Furthermore, the internal rotation position generally elicited the highest muscle activations. Notably, biceps femoris muscles exhibited higher activations compared to semitendinosus muscles, with the greatest differences seen in the internal rotation position. This suggests that tibial rotation influences hamstring recruitment patterns; however, it was lower than expected.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.