Abstract
A growing body of research indicates that effective science-policy interactions demand novel approaches, especially in policy domains with long time horizons like climate change. Serious games offer promising opportunities in this regard, but empirical research on game effects and games’ effectiveness in supporting science-policy engagement remains limited. We investigated the effects of a role-playing simulation game on risk perceptions associated with climate tipping points among a knowledgeable and engaged audience of non-governmental observers of the international climate negotiations and scientists. We analysed its effects on concern, perceived seriousness, perceived likelihood and psychological distance of tipping points, using pre- and post-game surveys, debriefing questions and game observations. Our findings suggest that the game reduced the psychological distance of tipping points, rendering them more ‘real’, proximate and tangible for participants. More generally, our findings indicate that role-playing simulation games, depending on their design and future orientation, can provide effective science-policy engagement tools that allow players to engage in future thinking and corresponding meaning making.
Highlights
The role of science in policy making has been a subject of a lively debate, especially regarding the effective communication of scientific information about climate change to policy makers and public audiences
Research on game effects among policy audiences, i.e. the games’ effectiveness as science-policy engagement processes, remains thin. Beginning to fill this gap, we investigated the effects of a role-playing simulation (RPS) game tailored to the needs and interests of the international climate negotiation community on players’ risk perceptions regarding climate tipping points
Survey questions included ten risk perception items regarding concern of climate tipping points (H1), perceived seriousness of risks associated with climate tipping points in general (H2), perceived geographical distance of tipping points (H3) (perceived risk to participants’ own vs. other countries (H3a), social distance (H3b), perceived temporal distance, i.e. the time scale on which participants expected the impacts of four tipping points to unfold (H3c)) and perceived current likelihood of two tipping points: coral reef dieback and Arctic Summer Sea Ice (ASSI) (H4)
Summary
The role of science in policy making has been a subject of a lively debate, especially regarding the effective communication of scientific information about climate change to policy makers and public audiences. Climate change generates particular knowledgerelated challenges for policy makers, especially the need to deal with uncertainty
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have