The effects of repeated oral exposures to methyl parathion on rat brain cholinesterase and muscarinic receptors during postnatal development.

Abstract

Dimethyl phosphorylated cholinesterase (ChE) is known to be more rapidly reactivated, spontaneously, and have a higher aging rate than diethyl phosphorylated ChE. This may result in differences in toxic signs and tolerance development after treatment of juvenile rats with methyl parathion (MPS), a dimethyl phosphorothionate, than after treatment with chlorpyrifos (CPS), a diethyl phosphorothionate. The effects of repeated MPS exposures on brain ChE activity and surface and total muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) density were studied in postnatal rats gavaged daily from postnatal day 1 (PND1) through PND 21. Results of this study were compared to our recent report with CPS (Tang et al., 1999, Toxicol. Sci. 51, 265-272). Rats received MPS daily starting at 0.3 mg/kg and increasing gradually to 0.6 mg/kg (for the medium-dosage groups) and then to 0.9 mg/kg (for the high-dosage group). ChE activity was assayed in brain homogenates. Synaptosomal mAChR densities, surface, and total were assayed using 3H-N-methylscopolamine (NMS) and 3H-quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB), respectively, as ligands. Developmental increases in brain ChE activities and mAChR densities were observed from PND 6 through PND 22. On PND 22, inhibition of ChE activity was observed in the low (26%)-, medium (42%)-, and high (55%)-dosage groups. Significant inhibition was still present on PND 30 (16-24%) and PND 40 (12-14%), which were 9 and 19 days after the last treatment, respectively. Densities of 3H-NMS and 3H-QNB binding sites in treated groups were significantly reduced by PND 22, 1 day following cessation of treatment, and were significantly increased during the recovery period. After MPS exposure, the initial recovery of phosphorylated ChE was more rapid and the density of 3H-NMS binding sites was less readily reduced than following CPS exposure. The lesser effects on surface mAChR may explain why more severe signs appeared after each treatment with the high dosage of MPS than were observed previously with CPS, indicating little or no tolerance had developed to MPS.