Abstract
AbstractLinear and non‐linear effects on baroclinic development of linear horizontal diffusion of the form K▽2q, where q is an integer and k, in general, a constant, are investigated using a spectral model and a climatological wintertime northern hemisphere basic state.An eigenvalue approach shows the greatest linear sensitivity to the diffusion to be in the high zonal wavenumbers (m > 12) which, in the absence of diffusion or with the more scale‐selective formulations (large q), are more unstable than the intermediate wavenumbers (m = 7–9). The ▽4 diffusion with a decay time scale of 6 h on the shortest retained scale, which has traditionally been used in our model, is shown to affect significantly the linear stability of almost all wavenumbers, whereas the more scale‐selective formulations have only a very small effect on m < 12.Without dissipation, integrations exhibit grossly physically unrealistic features after about nine days even with very high resolution, indicating the crucial role played by dissipation in non‐linear baroclinic development. Non‐linear integrations with dissipation show great sensitivity to the formulation used. Typically about three times more energy is converted from potential to kinetic with a ▽6 than with a ▽4 diffusion having a similar decay time scale on the smallest retained spatial scale. It appears that as the dissipation time scale on the large spatial scales is increased while retaining sufficiently short time scales near the truncation limit to prevent the accumulation of energy there, so the amount of potential to kinetic energy conversion approaches a limiting value equal to about five times the energy conversion with the ▽4 diffusion. In the limiting case the amount of energy lost to dissipation is equivalent to about 45% of that converted from potential to kinetic energy, again emphasizing the crucial role played by dissipation.It is found that if the decay time scale on the short spatial scales is too long then the integrations exhibit large truncation dependency. This provides a criterion for judging the suitability of a particular choice of dissipation, which might have quite general applicability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.