Abstract

The length of the reproductive life span, along with the number/frequency/magnitude of reproductive events, quantifies an individual's potential contribution to the next generation. By examining reproductive life span, and distinguishing it from somatic life span, we gain insight into critical aspects of an individual's potential fitness as well as reproductive and somatic senescence. Additionally, differentiating somatic and reproductive life spans can provide insight into the existence of a post‐reproductive period and factors that shape its duration. Given the known importance of diet and mating system on resource allocation, I reared individual freshwater snails (Physa acuta) from 22 full‐sib families under a 2 × 2 factorial design that crossed mate availability (available [outcrossing] or not [selfing]) and diet (Spirulina or lettuce) and quantified aspects of the entire life history enabling me to distinguish reproductive and somatic life spans, determine the total number of reproductive events, and evaluate how the reproductive rate changes with age. Overall, mated snails experienced shorter reproductive and somatic life spans; a diet of Spirulina also shortened both reproductive and somatic life spans. A post‐reproductive period existed in all conditions; its duration was proportional to somatic but not reproductive life span. I evaluate several hypotheses for the existence and duration of the post‐reproductive period, including a novel hypothesis that the post‐reproductive period may result from an increase in reproductive interval with age. I conclude that the post‐reproductive period may be indicative of a randomly timed death occurring as the interval between reproductive events continues to increase. As such, a “post‐reproductive” period can be viewed as a by‐product of a situation where reproductive senescence outpaces somatic senescence.

Highlights

  • The length of the life span, and importantly the reproductive life span, plays a critical role in determining individual fitness

  • While numer‐ ous life‐history studies have focused on events occurring early in the life cycle, far fewer have evaluated events occurring late in the life cycle; by measuring both we can differentiate the length of the re‐ productive life span from the somatic life span (Reznick, Bryant, & Holmes, 2006)

  • While the repro‐ ductive life span is necessarily shorter than the somatic life span because of a juvenile/developmental stage, it may be shortened when individuals cease to repro‐ duce before they die

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The length of the life span, and importantly the reproductive life span, plays a critical role in determining individual fitness. While the repro‐ ductive life span is necessarily shorter than the somatic life span because of a juvenile/developmental stage (i.e., a pre‐reproductive phase), it may be shortened when individuals cease to repro‐ duce before they die (i.e., a post‐reproductive phase) This might occur, for example, when the rate of reproductive senescence is faster than the rate of somatic senescence (Croft, Brent, Franks, & Cant, 2015; Kirkwood & Shanley, 2010) or when resource allocation to early‐life reproduction negatively affects the potential for late‐ life reproduction (e.g., as predicted by the disposable soma hypoth‐ esis; Kirkwood & Shanley, 2005, 2010 ). I measure the reproductive life span of a common fresh‐ water snail and relate it to somatic life span, reproductive rate, and reproductive output

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call