Abstract

This study uses a field experiment involving 251 adult participants to determine which messages related to climate change, extreme weather events, and decaying infrastructure are most effective in encouraging people to pay more for investments that could alleviate future water-quality risks. The experiment also assesses whether people prefer the investments to be directed toward gray or green infrastructure projects. Messages about global warming induced climate change and decaying infrastructure lead to larger contributions than messages about extreme weather events. The results suggest that people are likely to pay more for green infrastructure projects than for gray infrastructure projects.

Highlights

  • This study uses a field experiment involving 251 adult participants to determine which messages related to climate change, extreme weather events, and decaying infrastructure are most effective in encouraging people to pay more for investments that could alleviate future water-quality risks

  • The other three treatments kept the language related to The Conservation Fund (TCF) and American Water Works Association (AWWA) the same and changed the message related to weather events: Treatment A – Baseline generic message: “A donation to the Conservation Fund to help pay for green infrastructure investments that will protect drinking water quality when storms occur

  • Treatment C – Extreme events resulting from human-caused, global-warming message: “A donation to the Conservation Fund to help pay for green infrastructure investments that will protect drinking water quality when storms occur with increasing frequency due to human caused, global warming induced climate change

Read more

Summary

Literature

Our study is similar to Bulte et al.’s (2005) analysis of whether alternative causes of an environmental problem affect peoples’ WTP to resolve it; we employ a revealed-preference model of WTP instead of the hypothetical discrete choice model they used. Bulte et al (2005) presented.

Conclusion
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.