The Effects of Alloy Composition and Surface Integrity on the Machinability of Austenitic Stainless Steels 304 and 304L

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Austenitic stainless steels, such as 304 and 304L, are extensively utilized in diverse industries due to their favorable properties, including biocompatibility, high durability, ductility, toughness at cryogenic temperatures, and excellent corrosion resistance. Additionally, these steels exhibit notable resistance to fatigue and oxidation. Despite these advantages, they are challenging to machine due to characteristics such as high work hardening, built-up edge formation, and low heat conductivity. The material 304L distinguishes itself from material 304 through its lower carbon content, making it more resistance to corrosion. 304L is experiencing a consistent rise in industrial demand. It is anticipated that this advanced material will progressively supersede 304 in various applications. The variability in alloy compositions and surface integrity of blanks can influence the tool wear and may even lead to abrupt tool breakage, necessitating supervision during machining operations. This study delves into the correlation between the alloy compositions, micro structure, surface integrity, and machinability of these special steels, focusing on turning processes. Various blanks of 304 and 304L in the form of bars, sourced from different manufacturers, were utilized in the study. These blanks exhibited slight variations in alloy composition (albeit within the standard range) and differed in the state of surface integrity characterized by variations in microstructure, grain size, microhardness, and residual stress. All blanks (across this array of materials) were subjected to turning using the same tool specifications and sets of machining parameters for comparative analysis. Various machinability indicators, including cutting forces, surface roughness, burr formation, tool wear, and chip morphology, were thoroughly examined. The findings highlight that the key factors influencing machinability include the microhardness of the surface and the residual stress state in the subsurface of the bars before the turning process. In contrast, changing the alloy composition within the standard range has hardly any effect on the machinability of these steels. The machinability of the examined specimens was adversely affected when the hardness exceeded 350 HV from the surface up to 2 mm below the surface and simultaneously the surface compressive residual stress exceeded −130 MPa.