Abstract

Time of day (TOD) influences on executive functions have been widely reported, with greater efficiency demonstrated at optimal relative to non-optimal TOD according to one’s chronotype (i.e., synchrony effect). Older adults (OAs) show declines in inhibitory control and are more sensitive to the effects of circadian variation on executive functioning. To date, no studies have investigated the effects of TOD and aging on executive functioning using electrophysiological measures. The present study investigated the effects of aging and TOD on the neural correlates of inhibitory processing (N2 and P3) using event-related potentials (ERPs). Go-NoGo and Flanker tasks were administered to 52 OAs of morning chronotype and 51 younger adults (YAs) of afternoon-to-evening chronotype who were randomly assigned to morning or afternoon test sessions, with the optimal TOD for OAs in the morning and for YAs in the afternoon/evening. While behavioral results demonstrated no TOD effects, ERPs indicated synchrony effects. Both YAs and OAs showed greater modulation of Go-NoGo N2 and greater P3 amplitude during the non-optimal than optimal TOD, consistent with the synchrony effect. For the Flanker task, age differences in P3 amplitude were only apparent during the non-optimal TOD. These results suggest that processes associated with inhibitory control are differentially affected by TOD and aging, with age-related reductions in inhibitory efficiency during off-peak test times on measures of interference control. These findings highlight the sensitivity of ERPs to detect TOD effects in the absence of behavioral differences, confirm more pronounced TOD effects in OAs relative to YAs on ERP measures of interference control, and reinforce the need to assess and control for circadian typology in research studies.

Highlights

  • Inhibitory control is a core component of executive functioning that underlies the ability to restrain inappropriate prepotent responses and suppress irrelevant information

  • The present study investigated how age and TOD might interact during tasks engaging interference control and response inhibition using behavioral and electrophysiological measures

  • Neurophysiological results from this study showcase the influence of age-related circadian patterns on the inhibitory subtypes of response inhibition and interference control

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inhibitory control is a core component of executive functioning that underlies the ability to restrain inappropriate prepotent responses (i.e., response inhibition) and suppress irrelevant information (i.e., interference control; Zacks and Hasher, 1994; Diamond, 2013; Hasher and Campbell, 2020). This fundamental cognitive function is essential for coping with the demands of everyday life, Effects of Aging and Time-of-Day such as avoiding distractions while driving or withholding the expression of socially inappropriate thoughts while engaging in conversation. Interference control refers to the ability to filter out competing information present in the target or the environment, but irrelevant to the task being performed It is commonly measured by the Erikson Flanker task (Eriksen and Eriksen, 1974). Among the different inhibition tasks used in prior behavioral studies, the Go-NoGo task and the Eriksen Flanker Task are widely paired with neuroelectric recording of event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate response inhibition and interference control, respectively

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.