Abstract
Background. In adult living donor liver transplantation with the right lobe, the venous outflow of the anterior sector is typically restored during the procedure to form a neo-middle hepatic vein. Restoring the middle hepatic vein for the drainage of the anterior sector is critically important for achieving optimal graft function. Various conduits are used for this reconstruction, such as synthetic and biological grafts (e.g., the recipient's portal vein, vessels from a deceased donor, and modified great saphenous vein). However, the selection of the best option remains a topic of discussion. This study evaluates the effectiveness of using biological and synthetic grafts for MHV reconstruction. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of outcomes was conducted in patients who underwent transplantation of a modified right liver lobe due to end-stage liver disease from 2011 to 2024. Results. A transplantation of modified right liver lobes was performed on 80 patients. In 69 cases, the reconstruction of the hepatic veins was carried out using a biological graft, while in 11 cases, a synthetic graft was used. Statistically significant differences were noted in mortality and the postoperative period. No significant differences were found in the frequency of intraoperative complications. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that the use of a biological graft for the reconstruction of the hepatic veins of segments 5 and 8 is more effective than the application of a vascular prosthesis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.