Abstract
Interrupting long photoperiods by short periods of darkness — indicated as «Day Interruption» - resulted in an accelerated flower formation when applied early during the photophase as compared with late application, the total amount of light being the same in both cases. Day Interruption primarily influenced floral induction, whereas realization was influenced to a much smaller extent or not at all. It is not darkness as such but absence of light that is the determining factor. Different effects of Day Interruption according to the time of its application can be understood as different effects of the daily photoperiodic action, i.e. weak at the onset, but increasing sharply near the critical daylength. Suppression of the light action by darkness at a time when the effect of light is weak, results in earlier flower formation than suppression at a time when this effect is strong. The combined results of Day Interruption and Night Interruption lead to the conclusion that the photoperiodic action of light during a 24 h-cycle follows a circadian rhythm.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.