Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of work environment and work pressure on employee performance, the effect of the work environment on employee performance, the effect of job pressure on employee performance, the effect of job satisfaction on employee performance, the influence of the work environment on employee performance through job satisfaction variables, the effect of job pressure on employee performance through job satisfaction variables. The study was conducted on employees of the West Jakarta DJP Regional Office. The sampling technique used the saturated sample method involving 86 people. Data analysis using path analysis. The results of the study indicate that the work environment and work pressure variables affect employee performance. The calculated F value is 32.598 and the significance is 0.05. This value is smaller than 0.05. The r-squared value of 44.0% means that the work environment and work pressure variables affect employee performance by 44.0% while the rest is influenced by other variables that are not included in the equation model. Work environment variables affect employee performance partially. The t value is 7,310. The significance value is 0.00. This significance value is smaller than 0.05. The value of r squared is 38.9%. This means that the effect of work environment variables on employee performance is 38.9% and the rest is influenced by other variables that are not included in the equation model. The work pressure variable partially affects employee performance. The t value is 2.055. The significance value is 0.043. This significance value is smaller than 0.05. The value of r squared is 0.048. This means that the influence of the work pressure variable on employee performance is 4.8% and the rest is influenced by other variables that are not included in the equation model. Job satisfaction variable affects employee performance partially. The t value is 5,610. The significance value is 0.00. This significance value is smaller than 0.05. The value of r squared is 0.273. This means that the influence of the satisfaction variable on employee performance is 27.3% and the rest is influenced by other variables that are not included in the equation model. The effect of the work environment on employee satisfaction is 0.624. The effect of the work environment on employee satisfaction through job satisfaction is 0.385 x 0.522 = 0.201. In this case, the direct effect is greater than the indirect effect, so it can be said that the job satisfaction variable is not an intervening variable. The direct effect of work pressure on employee satisfaction is 0.219. While the effect of work pressure on employee performance through job satisfaction is 0.164 x 0.522 = 0.086. In this case, the direct effect is greater than the indirect effect, so it can be said that the job satisfaction variable is not an intervening variable.
Highlights
In the development of globalization, many companies are required to maximize employee performance
Based on the table above, it is known that the r-squared value of 44.0% means that the work environment and work pressure variables affect employee performance by 44.0% while the rest is influenced by other variables that are not included in the equation model
Predictors: (Constant), Work_Environment Based on the table above, it can be seen that the value of r squared is 38.9%. This means that the effect of work environment variables on employee performance is 38.9% and the rest is influenced by other variables that are not included in the equation model
Summary
In the development of globalization, many companies are required to maximize employee performance. This means that the company must be able to analyze the factors that can affect employee performance. Human resources (HR) are the most important development that must be considered because good and professional human resources will be very helpful in maximizing performance in a company. The resulting performance will affect the progress of the company and vice versa if the performance of a company is not good it will hamper the progress of the company. Performance is the result of work in quality and quantity achieved by an employee in carrying out his duties in accordance with the responsibilities given to him (Mangkunegara, 2001).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.