Abstract

Periodontally compromised teeth (PCT) that serve as terminal abutments (TAs) are often challenging depending on the post-and-core treatment, the type of partial fixed dental prosthesis (PFDP), and the periodontal support. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical impact of 3 types of PFDP supported by cast post-and-cores on PCT serving as terminal abutments. A 3-dimensional (3D) model of a human mandible was fabricated by using computed tomography (CT) images and parameterized in a computer-aided design (CAD) environment as follows: Right premolar preparation geometries were designed. The second premolar was assembled with 7-mm or 10-mm cast post-and-core models. Both premolar-models were designed to support single, splinted, or 1-unit cantilever splinted crowns. In each situation, their periodontium geometries were designed to be reduced by 10%, 50%, and 70%. All models were imported into a 3D finite element analysis (FEA) environment and loaded; von Mises stress values and distribution patterns were evaluated. Insertion of the post primarily affected the apical areas of both the root and post; the type of PFDP and periodontal support mainly affected stress distribution. In patients with a normal periodontium, splinting the teeth did not contribute to their stress relief. By extending the post length, a stressful area close to the apex of the post was developed. Splinting mitigated the stress field of the coronal part of the 50% PCT (up to 98.9%); the 30% PCT experienced a substantial decrease (up to 215.9%) in stress in the radical part as well. The increase in the length of the post produced negligible stress-related differences in the apical part of the 50% PCT (0.2% to 2.6%). The use of the 7-mm post effectively relieved the radical part of the splinted 30% PCT. The magnitude of the stress on the radical part of post-restored PCT was considerably increased in the presence of a cantilever. Splinted crowns supported by a 7-mm cast post-and-core are a favorable biomechanical approach for the restoration of PCT with severe loss of coronal structure. The use of a cantilever greatly aggravates the biomechanical response, especially of post-restored PCT.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call