The Effect of Two Different Methods According to a Computerized Running Training Programs for Interval Training in Special Endurance and Performance in A 400-Meter Sprint for Juniors

Abstract

The study aimed to: - Detecting the significance of the statistical differences in the special endurance (speed endurance and strength endurance) and performance in the 400-meter sprint between the pre and post-tests after using the method of (speed escalation and distance stabilization), According to a Computerized Running Training programs for interval training . - Detecting the significance of the statistical differences in the special endurance (speed endurance and strength endurance) and performance in the 400-meter sprint between the pre and post-tests after using the method of (distance escalation and speed stabilization) According to a Computerized Running Training programs for interval training. - Recognize the significance of the statistical differences in the special endurance (speed endurance and strength endurance) and performance in a 400-meter sprint between the two methods (speed escalation and distance stabilization) and (distance escalation and speed stabilization) According to a Computerized Running Training programs for interval training in the post-test . The researchers used the experimental approach for its convenience to the study nature, and the research experiment was carried out on a sample of short distance runners (junior category) at the Specialized School of Athletics in Nineveh Governorate for the sports season (2019-2020) and they were (12) runners, and this sample was divided into two experimental groups of During the randomization method with (6) runners for each group, The first depends on interval training in the method of (speed escalation and distance stabilization) and the second depends on interval training in the method of (distance escalation and speed stabilization) by relying on a programmed system for the sprint in interval training , based on score tables , as well as speed tables that are based on score tables that include determining the times that the runner must travel the sprint distance in and which are set on the basis of percentages or The measured stresses with the number of repetitions and the duration of the intermittent rest . The researchers reached the following conclusions: - Interval training in the method of (speed escalation and distance stabilization) and Interval training in the method of (distance escalation and speed stabilization) made positive progress in special endurance consisting of (speed endurance and strength endurance) and performance in the 400-meter sprint . - Despite the positive effect of interval training in the two methods (speed escalation and distance stabilization) and (distance escalation and speed stabilization) there was a relative superiority of interval training in the method of (speed escalation and distance stabilization) in the special endurance consisting of (speed endurance and strength endurance) and performance in Sprint 400 meters . The researchers recommended a set of recommendations, the most important of which are : - Using of interval training in the method of (speed escalation and distance stabilization) and not being satisfied with the use of interval training in the method (distance escalating and speed stabilization) when training a 400-meter sprint because of its importance in developing the special endurance consisting of (speed and strength endurance) and performance in the 400-meter sprint . - Possibility of relying on the Computerized Running Training programs for interval training in designing interval training methods and curricula for all short-distance runners, including 400-meter sprinting for all levels and age groups .