Abstract
Recent regulatory changes within Europe (regulation MiFID II) mandate broker-dealers to charge clients explicitly for any investment research they provide. This new mandate replaces the common practice of bundling these charges with other variable fees, such as those for trade executions. Drawing on transaction decoupling theory, I examine how transaction cost unbundling influences investors’ reliance on investment research. Results from 16 experimental markets indicate that investors place greater weight on costly forecasts under a system of unbundled payments compared to bundled payments, but only if transaction costs are sufficiently high to provoke feelings of regret. Focusing on the forecast, investors also cede to reduce price errors over time. Additional analysis suggests that salient cost disclosure, a more cost-effective way to generate transparent transaction costs, does not similarly impact investor judgment. These results are important in light of recent SEC discussions on how to respond to Europe’s regulatory push for cost transparency.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
