The Effect of Three Foot Types on the Achilles Tendon Lever Arm

Abstract

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: During locomotion, propulsion of the body is created by the force of the triceps surae complex as it is transmitted to the metatarsal heads. The amount and pattern of the resulting propulsion force highly depends on the moment arm of the Achilles tendon. To our knowledge, no data exists on how and to which extent position and morphology of the foot affects the moment arm of the Achilles tendon. The aim of this study was 1) to develop a method to determine the Achilles tendon moment arm, and 2) to calculate the Achilles tendon moment arm with the foot in different degrees of dorsi- and plantarflexion for 3 foot types (normal arched foot, pes planus, and pes cavus). Methods: 99 study participants with a healthy ankle joint (males, 40; females, 59; mean age 49 [range, 14 – 78] years) were included. Participants’ foot type was classified as a normal arched foot (n = 33), as pes planus (n = 33), or as pes cavus (n = 33) based on the calcaneal inclination angle (CI) (Figure 1). Besides the foot type, the foot length (FL), the calcaneal insertion of the Achilles tendon (ATI), the angle (a) between the line (L) connecting ATI with the center of rotation of the ankle (COR) and the horizontal line (L’) were measured on the lateral radiographs. The interrater reliabilities of measuring a on radiographs and on MRIs were compared. The lever arm of the Achilles tendon (L’calculated) was calculated as following (foot and tibia were regarded as two rigid segments; the influences of other muscles were neglected): L’calculated = cos(a - plantarflexion)*L Results: The interrater reliability of a was higher on radiographs (ICC = 0.84, [0.73 – 0.91]) than on MRIs (ICC = 0.61, [0.27 – 0.81]). The ICC comparing a measured on MRIs and radiographs was 0.63 [0.50-0.74]. There was no difference in FL between the three foot types (p = 0.199). However, the average a was significantly different (normal arched foot 31°, pes planus 24°, pes cavus 36°, p = 0.021), resulting in a statistically significant shorter Achilles tendon lever arm for pes cavus than for pes planus (p < 0.0001) and normal arched feet (p = 0.006) in neutral position. The maximum lever arm for the three different foot types was reached at different degrees of plantarflexion (Figure 2). Conclusion: The assessment of the Achilles tendon lever arm using radiographs is reliable. The foot configuration determines the lever arm of the Achilles tendon for a given flexion position of the foot. It also determines the plantarflexion position where the Achilles tendon reaches the maximum of its lever arm. This has to be taken into consideration when planning surgeries that change a or L, as they may also result in changes of plantarflexion power.