Racial Disparities in the Utilization of Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic Ankle Instability in the United States

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported on the impact of race and ethnicity on access to orthopaedic procedures in the United States. However, there are few studies evaluating racial disparities in elective foot and ankle surgeries. Recognizing and addressing disparities in the access of health resources are steps to improve care rationing. Our study specifically investigated potential racial disparities with utilization and perioperative metrics of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Current Procedural Terminology ( CPT) code 27698 was used to identify patients who underwent LALR from 2011 to 2020. Sixty-one percent of these patients had available race/ethnicity data and were included in the study. Designations of race and ethnicity were standardized as White non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, Hispanic, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and Other. Race/ethnicity stratifications of NSQIP patients were compared to 2010 and 2020 census data from the United States (US) Census Bureau. Thirty-day postoperative complications and total length of hospital stay, for all complications, were also compared between White patients and all other patients combined. Independent t tests, χ2, and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare differences including age, gender, and postoperative complications. Results: Overall, 1295 patients were included in the study. White non-Hispanic patients underwent 3.3 times more LALR than all other patients during the study period. This finding shows a higher prevalence of surgery on White non-Hispanic patients than all others reported in the US Census Bureau data for 2010 and 2020, where the ratio of White non-Hispanic vs all others were 1.9 and 1.5-fold, respectively. White patients were marginally older with a mean age of 38 years, compared with 36 years for Black patients ( P < .05). There were no differences in 30-day complication rates or total length of hospital stay based on race and ethnicity. Conclusion: Our study found that there was increased utilization of LALR for White non-Hispanic patients compared with all other racial/ethnic groups. These numbers do not mimic the current population trends based on the national census data. Despite this discrepancy, no differences in postoperative complications and length of stay were found based on race and ethnicity. These results suggest that there may be barriers for patients who are not White non-Hispanic to undergo care for LALR. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.