Abstract

Repeated exposure to aesthetic design results in consumers experiencing satiation because of sensory satiety. In other words, being consistently exposed to aesthetic stimuli activates consumers’ sensory satiety, defined as the drop in sensory pleasure, and the resulting reduction of their value of aesthetic products ultimately leads to switching intentions. That is, sensory satiety reduces functional and emotional benefits. Furthermore, consumers are unlikely to recall every item they have consumed, and are instead likely to focus on a particular option. Thus, this study predicts that consumers can recover from satiation over time. This research proposes that both satiation and accustomedness negatively affect functional benefit. As an empirical study, the research uses a multiple regression model for two purposes: The first is to test the impact of sensory satiety on perceived benefits, and the second is to observe the change in sensory satiety over time. We find that satiation and accustomedness, as sub-dimensional scales of sensory satiety, reduce perceived benefits. The results showed that it is clear that only satiation reduced functional benefits, whereas both satiation and accustomedness reduced emotional benefits. In addition, our study confirms the change in sensory satiety over time. Consumers who have been continuously exposed to, and used, aesthetic products become accustomed to them and feel satiated. Based on these results, this study will be useful for the sustainability of the product life cycle.

Highlights

  • Due to a rapid change in customers’ needs and the environment, many companies have recently made various efforts to propose new customer values and build strong customer relationships

  • Our research asks a simple but fundamental question: Does sensory satiety of aesthetic products reduce perceived benefit? Does sensory satiation change over time because of recovery from sensory satiety? this study investigates whether sensory satiety reduces perceived benefits

  • We evaluated reliability and validity based on two criteria: (1) Composite reliability and Cronbach’s alpha (α) should be greater than 0.7 in reliability testing; (2) all factor loadings should exceed 0.4

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to a rapid change in customers’ needs and the environment, many companies have recently made various efforts to propose new customer values and build strong customer relationships. Companies are increasingly interested in exceptional marketing programs, which are designed to provide the customers with values that can induce mutual understanding beyond purchasing and using products [1,2]. While building successful experiential marketing that will help establish customer loyalty, companies are becoming interested in developing aesthetic benefits that will satisfy consumers’ sensory pleasure needs [3,4,5,6]. The daily life of the average consumer is filled with aesthetic design These aesthetic products typically aim to increase product awareness and purchase intentions, often by highlighting hedonic consumption and inviting consumers to imagine the sensory experience for themselves. Many companies that have reached the limit of differentiating based on product quality are beginning to focus on aesthetic design, as consumers respond favorably to synesthesia from afferent marketing stimuli. An aesthetic response that has never been experienced incites curiosity in the consumer, and leads to the purchase of the product after the discovery [26,27,28]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call