Abstract
Judgments of recency were found to depend on whether the event judged had occurred once or twice. Repeated events outside of the immediate memory span were judged more recent when the occurrences were massed, but the effect was not consistent with spaced occurrences. Subjects judged the frequency of spaced repetitions as accurately as massed repetitions. The results were interpreted as supporting a view that Ss judge recency by discriminating strength of traces.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
