Abstract
Reading comprehension is a crucial component of academic development for students engaged in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). This study investigates the efficacy of alternative assessment methods, specifically performance assessment, in enhancing reading comprehension skills within the ESP context. Given that reading comprehension is a fundamental input skill, deficiencies in this area can significantly impede academic progress. The research employed a pre-test and post-test experimental design with a control group to evaluate the impact of performance assessment on reading comprehension. Participants, after a proficiency test, were randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group, each of comparable proficiency levels. The experimental group received continuous assessment and immediate, relevant feedback during the training, while the control group did not receive such assessment or feedback. The experimental group's assessment was facilitated through a detailed assessment grid. Data were collected through pre-tests and post-tests administered to both groups and analyzed using SPSS (2018). Statistical analyses, including paired samples t-tests and independent samples t-tests, were conducted to measure intra-group progress and inter-group differences. Findings indicate that both groups showed significant improvement in reading comprehension; however, the experimental group exhibited superior performance across all comprehension categories compared to the control group. The results underscore the effectiveness of performance assessment in fostering both higher-order and lower-order reading comprehension skills, suggesting a pronounced advantage over traditional assessment methods. The study affirms the value of performance assessment in ESP contexts while also acknowledging the continued relevance of traditional assessment techniques.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0871/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
