The effect of inpatient versus outpatient location on postoperative healthcare utilization after neonatal circumcision

Abstract

Background/PurposeNeonatal circumcision is a common pediatric procedure performed in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. We aimed to determine if procedure location affected 30-day post-procedure healthcare utilization rates, inpatient length of stay (LOS), and amount charged. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study comparing 30-day postoperative healthcare utilization (emergency department (ED) visits, office visits, readmissions) of full-term infants who underwent an outpatient versus inpatient (same admission as birth) circumcision from 2015 to 2020. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests, multivariable adjusted logistic regression models when appropriate. Results3137 infants were included, 1426 (45.5%) had an outpatient circumcision, 1711 (54.5%) an inpatient. Outpatient had similar overall healthcare utilization rates as inpatients (5.7% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.933). The number of ED visits (1.5% vs 0.8%, p = 0.055), office visits (4.5% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.437), and readmissions (0.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.058) were not significantly different. Infants with inpatient circumcisions had longer LOS after adjusting for age, ethnicity and delivery type (Cesarean versus vaginal) with an incident rate ratio of 1.97 (95% confidence interval 1.84–2.11, p<0.001). Outpatient circumcision resulted in average charges of $372 more than inpatient. ConclusionsOutpatient circumcision has a minimal effect on healthcare utilization rates but lead to a shorter hospital stay following birth and increased charge. Study DesignRetrospective Level of EvidenceIII