Abstract

In this research, the probabilistic seismic performance of asymmetric reinforced concrete wall-frame buildings with different strength distributions incorporating foundation flexibility effects is examined. By using probability-based performance evaluation approach, it is possible to provide a more accurate prediction of the different strength distribution effect on the seismic performance of asymmetric buildings and find the most efficient strength distribution for meeting each performance level. These efficient distributions can be adopted in the performance-based design of asymmetric buildings. For this purpose, first, the regression analysis and the concepts of efficiency and sufficiency were used to determine an optimal intensity measure (IM) for incremental dynamic analysis and evaluating the seismic response of the considered building models. Then, the proper magnitude of interstory drift capacity for this type of buildings in each limit state was estimated using the damage index concept. Finally, the effects of different strength distributions and the flexibility of foundation were studied on the seismic performance of the asymmetric buildings by investigating the mean annual frequencies of exceeding structural performance levels and confidence levels to satisfy performance objectives. It is concluded that irregular distributions of stiffness and strength in the plan of a building highly affect the seismic performance of buildings. Also, the results show that the optimum strength distribution is a function of the objective performance level and these optimum strength distributions are the same for both fixed- and flexible-base conditions. Meanwhile, the flexible effect of foundation increases the mean annual frequencies of exceedance within the range of 10% to 45% and significantly decreases the confidence levels in most cases.

Highlights

  • In this research, the probabilistic seismic performance of asymmetric reinforced concrete wall-frame buildings with different strength distributions incorporating foundation flexibility effects is examined

  • The results show that the optimum strength distribution is a function of the objective performance level and these optimum strength distributions are the same for both fixed- and flexible-base conditions

  • Tso and Myslimaj [9, 10] proposed a yield displacement distribution-based approach for strength allocation to D-type lateral force-resisting elements (LFREs) which does not need the information of stiffness distribution prior to the strength allocation. ey used a single-story wall-type model and investigated the effects of different arrangements of centers of stiffness (CS) and strength (CR) with respect to the center of mass (CM) on the diaphragm rotation response of the model. ey concluded that the optimal arrangement of the centers is one where the centers of strength and stiffness are located on opposite sides of the mass center. is configuration is known as “balanced CS-CR location” in the literature. e authors demonstrated that there is a noticeable change in the trend of the diaphragm rotation at different seismic input levels

Read more

Summary

Sahar Mohammadzadeh Osalu and Hamzeh Shakib

The probabilistic seismic performance of asymmetric reinforced concrete wall-frame buildings with different strength distributions incorporating foundation flexibility effects is examined. Erefore, this study has provided an opportunity to examine the influence of soil-foundation flexibility on the seismic behavior, in addition to strength distribution effects by implementing incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and reliability-based probabilistic approach For this purpose, first, the efficiency and sufficiency of different intensity measures (IMs) for evaluating the seismic response of the models were investigated and an optimal IM was chosen for performance assessment. The effect of different strength distributions was studied on the probabilistic performance of asymmetric buildings in fixed- and flexible-base conditions by evaluating the mean annual frequencies of exceedance and confidence levels to satisfy performance objectives.

Mc My
Soil type D
Calipatria Fire Station
Peak ground acceleration Peak ground velocity
Damage state
Damage index
LSFIX LSSSI
IO LS CP
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call