Abstract

AbstractTitanium nitride and hafnium oxide stack have been widely used in various resistive memory elements since the materials are complementary‐metal‐oxide‐semiconductor compatible. The understanding of the interface properties between the electrode and the oxide is important in designing the memory behavior. To bridge this understanding, HfOx grown using plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) and thermal atomic layer deposition (TALD) are compared, in terms of band alignment and electrical performances in the HfOx/PEALD TiN stacks. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals a thicker interfacial TiO2 layer in the PEALD HfOx/TiN stack whose interface resembles more to the PEALD HfOx/TiO2 interface (conduction band offset ΔEC = 1.63 eV), whereas the TALD HfOx stack interface resembles more to the TALD HfOx/TiN interface (ΔEC = 2.22 eV). The increase in the forming voltage and the early onset of reverse filament formation (RFF) in the I–V measurements for the PEALD HfOx stack confirms the presence of the thicker interfacial layer; the early onset of RFF is likely related to a smaller ΔEC. The findings show the importance of understanding the intricate details of the material stack, where ΔEC difference and the presence of a thicker TiO2 interfacial layer due to different deposition procedures affect the device performance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call