Abstract

Abstract A comparison was made of establishment of five white clover lines sown as pure swards on soil infested with stem eelworm (Ditylenchus dipsaci) and on uninfested soil. On infested soil two lines found to be resistant (Morocco × ‘Grasslands 4700’ and Ladino × ‘Grasslands 4700’) showed most rapid establishment and least production loss due to poor establishment. A very susceptible line from Israel suffered severe loss due to eelworm attack, and the varieties ‘Grasslands Huia’ and ‘Grasslands 4700’, known to be of intermediate susceptibility, showed an intermediate loss of production due to the effects of eelworm on establishment. All except the Israeli line recovered from the initial effect of eelworm attack on newly germinated seedlings and within 9 months from sowing were producing as much forage dry matter in the presence as in the absence of eelworm. Recovery was possible by virtue of the sprawling nature of the white clover plant, the rate being related to the proportion of seedlings which survived eelworm attack. This recovery phenomenon may explain the absence of apparent economic eelworm effects in established New Zealand pastures.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.