Abstract
Low-intensity contractions with blood flow occlusion (BFO) result in neuromuscular adaptations comparable with high-intensity (>70% maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) exercise. Because BFO exercise can only be applied to limb muscles, it is of interest to explore whether muscles proximal to the occlusion site are affected. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess neural activation of the tibialis anterior (TA) when flow is occluded proximal and distal to the active muscle. Five males completed three protocols to observe the effect of BFO on motor unit firing rates (MUFR) of the TA at a fatiguing contraction intensity of ∼15% MVC. Two occlusion protocols, one proximal (BFOprox) to and one distal (BFOdis) to the TA, were compared with a control (free-flow) protocol time-matched to BFOdis. MVC was significantly reduced following the BFOprox (∼41%; P< 0.001) and BFOdis (∼27%, P< 0.001), but not following the control protocol (∼15%; P= 0.13). Surface electromyography (EMG) during BFOdis and BFOprox increased ∼14% and ∼28%, respectively, but was not different among protocols. MUFRs for BFOdis and BFOprox were significantly reduced (by ∼33% and ∼23%, respectively; P< 0.01) at task failure. Results indicate that although BFOprox results in the largest reductions of MUFRs, BFOdis shows greater impairments compared with the free-flow control condition. Novelty Effects on motor unit firing rates of proximal versus distal blood flow occlusion were compared during low-intensity fatiguing task. Proximal occlusion results in greatest fatigue and reduction in motor unit rates, but distal occlusion elicits more fatigue and rate reduction than a control task.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have