Abstract

BackgroundCompensating for the effect of gravity by providing arm-weight support (WS) is a technique often utilized in the rehabilitation of patients with neurological conditions such as stroke to facilitate the performance of arm movements during therapy. Although it has been shown that, in healthy subjects as well as in stroke survivors, the use of arm WS during the performance of reaching movements leads to a general reduction, as expected, in the level of activation of upper limb muscles, the effects of different levels of WS on the characteristics of the kinematics of motion and of the activity of upper limb muscles have not been thoroughly investigated before.MethodsIn this study, we systematically assessed the characteristics of the kinematics of motion and of the activity of 14 upper limb muscles in a group of 9 healthy subjects who performed 3-D arm reaching movements while provided with different levels of arm WS. We studied the hand trajectory and the trunk, shoulder, and elbow joint angular displacement trajectories for different levels of arm WS. Besides, we analyzed the amplitude of the surface electromyographic (EMG) data collected from upper limb muscles and investigated patterns of coordination via the analysis of muscle synergies.ResultsThe characteristics of the kinematics of motion varied across WS conditions but did not show distinct trends with the level of arm WS. The level of activation of upper limb muscles generally decreased, as expected, with the increase in arm WS. The same eight muscle synergies were identified in all WS conditions. Their level of activation depended on the provided level of arm WS.ConclusionsThe analysis of muscle synergies allowed us to identify a modular organization underlying the generation of arm reaching movements that appears to be invariant to the level of arm WS. The results of this study provide a normative dataset for the assessment of the effects of the level of arm WS on muscle synergies in stroke survivors and other patients who could benefit from upper limb rehabilitation with arm WS.

Highlights

  • Compensating for the effect of gravity by providing arm-weight support (WS) is a technique often utilized in the rehabilitation of patients with neurological conditions such as stroke to facilitate the performance of arm movements during therapy

  • Changes in upper limb kinematics do not show distinct trends with the level of arm WS The analysis of the hand trajectory and the joint angular displacement trajectories for the trunk, shoulder and elbow showed no distinct trends with the level of arm WS provided during the performance of arm reaching movements

  • Our experiments and data analyses showed that the kinematics of the upper limb in healthy subjects performing arm reaching movements changed with the levels of arm WS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Compensating for the effect of gravity by providing arm-weight support (WS) is a technique often utilized in the rehabilitation of patients with neurological conditions such as stroke to facilitate the performance of arm movements during therapy. Over the last two decades, robotic systems providing adjustable levels of arm-weight support (WS) have been utilized in the rehabilitation of subjects with neurological conditions such as stroke [1,2,3,4,5,6] These systems facilitate the performance of upper limb motor training exercises by partially or totally compensating for the effect of gravity, decreasing the magnitude of the joint torques that. Recent studies have provided preliminary results in regard to how arm WS may modify the kinematics of motion and the activity of upper limb muscles during arm reaching movements [8,9,10] In both healthy subjects and stroke survivors, WS devices have been shown to facilitate arm movements by reducing the level of muscle activity needed for reaching, for muscles counteracting the effect of gravity [8,9]. This is clinically relevant since muscle coordination is often altered in patients with neurological conditions such as stroke [11,12,13,14,15,16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call