Abstract
This paper reviews the rationale behind the recent US Supreme Court ruling in the University of Michigan's Grutter v. Bollinger case (2003). It describes the educational benefits of diversity as documented by research and argued by the seventy-five amicus briefs filed in support of the law school's race-based admissions policies. It further discusses the implications of the Grutter decision on race-conscious decisions, on “choice” integration programs, and on increased diversity strategies in K–12 schooling based on the requirements of compelling interest and policies that are narrowly tailored.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
