Abstract
The clinical data and therapeutic results of 37 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms were retrospectively analyzed, among whom 22 patients underwent endovascular embolization or angioplasty and stenting, and 15 patients underwent clipping of the aneurysms. All of those patients were followed up for 6-12 months after operation. The recovery rate of the former was obviously higher than the latter, while the disability rate was lower. Compared with clipping, endovascular embolization therapy or stenting in the treatment for ruptured aneurysm has a lot of advantages, such as smaller trauma, faster recovery, shorter hospitalization time, high curative effect and safety, achieving satisfactory clinical effect.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
