Abstract

Most human societies are characterized by the presence of different identity groups which cooperate but also compete for resources and power. To deepen our understanding of the underlying social dynamics, we model a society subdivided into groups with constant sizes and dynamically changing powers. Both individuals within groups and groups themselves participate in collective actions. The groups are also engaged in political contests over power which determines how jointly produced resources are divided. Using analytical approximations and agent-based simulations, we show that the model exhibits rich behavior characterized by multiple stable equilibria and, under some conditions, non-equilibrium dynamics. We demonstrate that societies in which individuals act independently are more stable than those in which actions of individuals are completely synchronized. We show that mechanisms preventing politically powerful groups from bending the rules of competition in their favor play a key role in promoting between-group cooperation and reducing inequality between groups. We also show that small groups can be more successful in competition than large groups if the jointly-produced goods are rivalrous and the potential benefit of cooperation is relatively small. Otherwise large groups dominate. Overall our model contributes towards a better understanding of the causes of variation between societies in terms of the economic and political inequality within them.

Highlights

  • Most human societies are characterized by the presence of different identity groups which cooperate and compete for resources and power

  • We explicitly model the dynamics of power focusing on the effects of a parameter measuring the strength of mechanisms preventing politically powerful factions from bending the rules of competition in their own f­avor[40,41,52,53]

  • We aim to shed light on the following questions: when and why cooperation emerge in group-structured societies? What are the causes of variation between societies in terms of economic and political inequality within them? What are the effects of checks-and-balances preventing politically powerful factions from bending the rules of competition in their own favor on cooperation and inequality? How do the group size and within-group interactions affect cooperation and inequality at the between-group level?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most human societies are characterized by the presence of different identity groups which cooperate and compete for resources and power. Examples of groups engaged both in cooperation and power conflicts are common in modern human societies These include social classes, political parties, and different ethnic, religious, or regional groups. Between-group inequality affected the historical development and survival of many tribes, chiefdoms, states, and ­empires[17,18,19] To better understand these processes, we need to consider the dynamics of collective a­ ction[4,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] in cooperation and conflict at multiple l­evels[5]. In the fields of biological and cultural evolution, there is an extensive theory of “multilevel selection” describing both within-group cooperation and between-group competition The former is usually modeled by linear public goods games (PGG). These studies highlight the political aspects of human societies which play an important role in their dynamics

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call