Abstract

Background: Organizational learning theory has retained considerable attention in the past decades from a wide array of academic disciplines in social sciences. Yet few integrative efforts have satisfactorily offered a comprehensive and systematic articulation of the concept of organizational learning with regards to: (a) its core constitutive dimensions and associated mechanisms; (b) the analytical levels from such mechanisms operate (e.g., workers, teams, organizations); as well as (c) their interplay. Methods: This article builds on a critical synthesis of predominant approaches in organizational learning theory (i.e., structural functionalist, social constructivist and middle range approaches), highlighting the contributions of each approach on the key analytical elements guiding our inquiry (i.e., core dimensions and associated mechanisms, analytical levels, interplay). Drawing from the work of sociologists Anthony Giddens and Margaret Archer on agency-structure theory, we develop a series of theoretical propositions supporting the Organizational Learning Practices (OLP) concept as a unifying heuristic tool. Results: OLP are defined as a set of collectively shared practices held by members of a given organization embedded in normative, political, and semantic dynamics. At the heart of such dynamics lies organizational knowledge as a power resource pivotal to the sustainable development of organizations, as well as that of their members. Conclusion: OLP offer promising answers to on-going debates in organizational learning theory, and we conclude by discussing concrete guidelines to advance research and practice on OLP.

Highlights

  • Since its first introduction by Cyert and March [1], the concept of organizational learning has long been portrayed as a key milestone for the sustainability of organizations

  • The aim of this paper consists in introducing the heuristic tool of organizational learning practices, which results from such an endeavor

  • Three main streams of research have characterized organizational learning theory to date: (a) macrolevel approaches focusing on organizational- and societal-level dynamics; (b) microlevel approaches focusing on individual- and group-level dynamics; and (c) middle range approaches working towards the integration of (a) and (b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since its first introduction by Cyert and March [1], the concept of organizational learning has long been portrayed as a key milestone for the sustainability of organizations. The purpose it pursues is one of high relevance to organizational research and practice, that is, the comprehension of the dynamics through which organizations adapt to environmental complexity, uncertainty and change. Along with others [4], we believe that resolving such an issue warrants a finer appreciation of organizational learning through the determination of its core constitutive domains, their levels of analysis (i.e., workers, teams, organization) and interconnections. The aim of this paper consists in introducing the heuristic tool of organizational learning practices, which results from such an endeavor. We outline implications for future research and practice on organizational learning

Organizational Learning Theory: A Critical Overview
Structural Functionalist Approach to Organizational Learning
Social Constructivist Approach to Organizational Learning
Integrative Approaches to Organizational Learning
Organizational Learning Theory
Moving Towards an Agency-Structure Approach to Organizational Learning
The Modalities of Organizational Practices
Reclaiming One’s Organizational Identity
The Concept of Organizational Learning Practices
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call