Abstract
Most rotation functions try to achieve maximal correlation between two Patterson functions by systematically rotating one and computing the overlap with the other. In contrast, the direct rotation function rotates a search model relative to the crystal unit cell and evaluates the linear correlation coefficient (Patterson correlation, PC) between squared normalized structure-factor amplitudes of the observed and calculated diffraction data. Structure factors are calculated from the rotated search model in a P1 unit cell identical to that of the target crystal. PC makes use of all self-Patterson vectors of the search model. A comparison of the direct rotation function, a real-space rotation function, and a fast rotation function suggests that the direct rotation function provides a considerable enhancement of the signal-to-noise ratio compared to other two. Combined with PC refinement, the direct rotation function was successful in solving multidomain macromolecular crystal structures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.