Abstract

We compute the momentum-transfer dependence of the proton Pauli form factor $F_{2}$ in the endpoint overlap model. We find the model correctly reproduces the scaling of the ratio of $F_{2}$ with the Dirac Form factor $F_{1}$ observed at the Jefferson Laboratory. The calculation uses the leading-power, leading twist Dirac structure of the quark light-cone wave function, and the same endpoint dependence previously determined from the Dirac form factor $F_{1}$. There are no parameters and no adjustable functions in the endpoint model's prediction for $F_{2}$. The model's predicted ratio $F_{2}(Q^{2})/F_{1}(Q^{2})$ is quite insensitive to the endpoint wave function, which explains why the observed ratio scales like $1/Q$ down to rather low momentum transfers. The endpoint model appears to be the only comprehensive model consistent with all form factor information as well as reproducing fixed-angle proton-proton scattering at large momentum transfer. Any one of the processes is capable of predicting the others.

Highlights

  • The electromagnetic form factors know as F1 and F2 are an important probe of the internal structure of nucleons

  • In our estimate of the form factor F2 we used the wave function given in Eq 12, whose x dependence was determined by fitting the Dirac form factor, F1

  • Between and came a period attempting to dispense with hadron structure in form factors, and replacing protons with perturbation theory, which revealed very little about hadron structure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The electromagnetic form factors know as F1 and F2 are an important probe of the internal structure of nucleons. All previous calculations known to us at leading power order integrate quark wave functions over the small momentum in the first step This appears to be much more safe than integrating over the transverse momentum components, which scale like 1 compared to e−y. This is a remarkable prediction of the model: If attention had been given 30 years ago, it would have predicted F2 in advance of the data. The ratio F2(Q2)/F1(Q2) is quite insensitive to the endpoint wave function, explaining why the observed ratio goes like 1/Q down to rather small momentum transfer

Endpoint Calculation q k1
Coordinates
The Matrix element
Integration
The ratio of form factors
Soft gluon exchange
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.