Abstract
Early, accurate diagnosis of children with developmental coordination disorder is crucial to enable effective intervention. This study examined a diagnostic method in an Australian school population. In a two-step process, the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) was distributed to parents of 460 children. Using the DCDQ results, children suspected of having developmental coordination disorder, and age and sex matched control children, attended a physical assessment [Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC)]. Fifty-seven children completed M-ABC assessments. The internal consistency of the DCDQ was high (alpha 0.88), but the M-ABC (alpha 0.75) failed to reach the specified cut-off. Factor analysis revealed discrepancies in the proposed subtest structures. Sensitivity and specificity using the original cut-off scores was somewhat low, cluster analysis identified alternative cut-off scores. The DCDQ is reliable and valid; however the ability of the combination of these two tests to identify children was only fair.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.