Abstract
The objectives of this research were 1) to develop an Intelligent Multilevel Item Bank (I-MIB) Model for the National Evaluation of Undergraduates and 2) to assess the appropriateness of the I-MIB Model for the National Evaluation of Undergraduates. The results of the research were as follows: 1. The I-MIB Model for the National Evaluation of Undergraduates consisted of four parts: Input, Process, Output, Feedback. The Input consisted of 1. Curriculum, 2. Subject, 3. Topic, 4. Objectives, 5. Cognitive Skills, 6. Teacher, 7. Student, and 8. Program Designated Lecturers. The Process consisted of 1. Question Management, 2. Cognitive Skills Processing, 3. Data Mining, 4. Trial Testing, 5. Improving Questions, 6. Testing, 7. Proficiency Classification, and 8. Suggestions. The Output consisted of 1. Testing Report, 2. Proficiency Level, and 3. Suggestions. Finally, the Feedback consisted of returning the evaluation results to improve the input and process and yield accurate evaluation results. 2. The assessment of the appropriateness of the I-MIB model for the national evaluation of undergraduates included 13 experts with an expertise in ICT for education, information technology, computer science, and educational measurement and evaluation. The evaluation results found that the I-MIB model for the evaluation of national undergraduates was suitable at the highest level with a mean of 4.60 and a standard deviation of 0.58.
Highlights
Thailand has established a system for educational quality assurance under the National Education Act of 1999 and its amendment (Version 2) in 2002, which supports the development of educational quality and standards at all levels
The Feedback consisted of returning the evaluation results to improve the input and process and yield accurate evaluation results
The evaluation results found that the Intelligent Multilevel Item Bank (I-MIB) model for the evaluation of national undergraduates was suitable at the highest level with a mean of 4.60 and a standard deviation of 0.58
Summary
Thailand has established a system for educational quality assurance under the National Education Act of 1999 and its amendment (Version 2) in 2002, which supports the development of educational quality and standards at all levels. Higher education institutions must use a standardized qualification framework as a guideline for the development or improvement of curriculum and teaching to ensure that graduates produced at the same qualification level are held to comparable quality standards, both at the national level and international level [1]. 4164 The Development of an Intelligent Multilevel Item Bank Model for the National Evaluation of Undergraduates measurement tool that is widely used and works well is the item, and the most commonly used item is the multiple-choice test. This is because the test can measure every level of achievement according to Bloom's educational objective classification, from the knowledge level to the evaluation level. Most instructors prefer to use multiple-choice tests to measure student achievement. [4]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
