Abstract

The Upper Silesian coal basin (USCB) in Poland faces significant ground deformation issues resulting from mining activities conducted without backfill, which can persist for years. These activities can cause damage to surface structures and phenomena such as induced seismicity. Ground deformations can be monitored using differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry (DInSAR). However, various DInSAR approaches have their own advantages and limitations, particularly regarding accuracy and atmospheric filtering. This is especially important for high-frequency displacement signals associated with seismic activity, which can be filtered out. Therefore, this study aims to assess the detectability of mining-induced seismic events using interferometric techniques, focusing on the USCB area. In this experiment, we tested two InSAR approaches: conventional DInSAR without atmospheric filtering and the small baseline subset (SBAS) approach, where the atmospheric phase screen was estimated and removed using high-pass and low-pass filtering. The results indicate that, in most cases, post-seismic ground displacement is not detectable using both methods. This suggests that mining-related seismic events typically do not cause significant post-seismic ground displacement. Out of the 17 selected seismic events, only two were clearly visible in the DInSAR estimated deformation, while for four other events, some displacement signals could neither be definitively confirmed nor negated. Conversely, only one seismic event was clearly detectable in the SBAS displacement time series, with no evidence of induced tremors found for the other events. DInSAR proved to be more effective in capturing displacement signals compared to SBAS. This could be attributed to the small magnitude of the tremors and, consequently, the small size of the seismic sources. Throughout the investigated period, all registered events had magnitudes less than 4.0. This highlights the challenge of identifying any significant influence of low-magnitude tremors on ground deformation, necessitating further investigations. Moreover, SBAS techniques tend to underestimate mining displacement rates, leading to smoothed deformation estimates, which may render post-seismic effects invisible for events with low magnitudes. However, after an in-depth analysis of the 17 seismic events in the USCB, DInSAR was found to be more effective in capturing displacement signals compared to SBAS. This indicates the need for significant caution when applying atmospheric filtering to high-frequency displacement signals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call