Abstract
This article introduces a Special Issue comprising four papers emerging from the Beauty Demands Network project, and maps key issues in the beauty debate. The introduction first discusses the purpose of the Network; to consider the changing demands of beauty across disciplines and beyond academia. It then summarises the findings of the Network workshops, emphasising the complex place of notions of normality, and the different meanings and functions attached to ‘normal’ in the beauty context. Concerns are raised here about the use of normal to justify and motivate engaging in beauty practices such as cosmetic surgery and ‘non-invasive’ procedures. Other workshop findings included the recognition of beauty as increasingly a global value rather than a culturally distinct ideal, and the understanding that there is no clear distinction between beauty practices that are considered standard and those that are considered extreme. These themes, especially the concerns around understanding of normal, are reflected in the recommendations made by the Network in its Briefing Paper, which are presented next in this introduction. A further theme picked up by these recommendations is the extent to which individuals who are not traditionally vulnerable may be so in the beauty context. Finally, the introduction highlights the key matters covered in the four papers of the Special Issue: regulatory concerns around cosmetic surgery tourism; the impact of digitally altered images from psychological and philosophical perspectives; the ethics of genetic selection for fair skin; and the attraction and beauty of the contemporary athletic body.
Highlights
The Beauty Demands NetworkThe purpose of the original AHRC grant was to bring together academics from across disciplines, with policy-makers, practitioners, activists and cultural actors to think collectively and creatively about the changing demands of beauty
This volume is one of the outcomes of an AHRC Network Grant “The Changing Requirements of Beauty” which begin in September 2014
The Network continues to enable collaboration between researchers across disciplinary lines and is becoming a first point of contact for those seeking expertise on issues of beauty. The papers in this Special Issue are part of the academic reflection and theorising which evolved from the Beauty Demands Network [3]
Summary
The purpose of the original AHRC grant was to bring together academics from across disciplines, with policy-makers, practitioners, activists and cultural actors to think collectively and creatively about the changing demands of beauty. To set minimum standards for products which can be used in beauty practices To ensure that informed consent is sought personally by the practitioner carrying out the procedure; for all so-called non-invasive procedures as well as surgical procedures To require a ‘cooling off period’ for all procedures (cosmetic surgery and socalled non-invasive procedures) To separate roles of salespersons and advertisers from practitioners performing procedures To consider changing practice and policy with regard to advertisements to reduce risk of unrealistic expectations To put in place processes for better data collection, monitoring and reporting measures Some of these recommendations, those around consent, data, the need to regulate non-surgical as well as surgical procedures, and the need to ensure sales techniques are not coercive, are very familiar from the Keogh Review and the recent Nuffield Council Report [9, 13]. Our body becomes the place where we tell our stories, we use it to tell others who we are and even what we are, “we write ourselves – and our insecurities – on our bodies, for our bodies, actual, transforming and imagined, are ourselves” [15, p. 209]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.