The day-to-day reliability of residual force enhancement during voluntary and electrically stimulated contractions.

Abstract

Residual force enhancement (rFE) is characterized by increased steady-state isometric force following active muscle lengthening compared to a fixed-end isometric contraction at the same muscle length and level of neuromuscular activation. Many studies have characterized rFE in humans; however, the day-to-day reliability of rFE is unclear. We aimed to examine day-to-day reliability of rFE across various contraction types in the dorsiflexors in males and females. Twenty-five recreationally active young adults completed 2 visits, 1 week apart. Following determination of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) strength, rFE was assessed during maximal voluntary effort, 20% MVC electrically stimulated, and 20% MVC torque-matching conditions. Each rFE condition was completed at 2 joint excursions: 0-20º plantar flexion (PF) and 0-40ºPF. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed relative reliability, and typical error of measurement (TEM), and the correlation variability of TEM (CVTEM) assessed absolute reliability. Electrically stimulated contractions demonstrated the highest reliability at 40ºPF (ICC:0.9; CVTEM:22.8 %) and 20ºPF (ICC:0.8; CVTEM:34.3 %), followed by maximal voluntary contractions at 40ºPF (ICC:0.7; CVTEM:55.1%) and 20ºPF (ICC:0.1; CVTEM:81.1%). The torque-matching trials showed poor reliability for 20º and 40ºPF (ICC: -0.1-0.3; CVTEM: 118.1 %-155.2 %). Our results demonstrate higher reliability of rFE when stretching to the descending limb of the torque-angle relationship compared to the plateau region, and in electrically stimulated compared to voluntary contractions in the dorsiflexors for both males and females.