The crux of C1-INH testing in everyday lab work

Abstract

BackgroundThe determination of functional C1-INH is complex and depends on methodology, sample transport, and storage conditions. In clinical practice, we encounter individuals with pathological values which then cannot be proved true, and HAE patients in whom the values were wrongly found to be normal under non-optimum conditions. We aimed to test realistic real-life sample processing conditions for accurate C1-INH determination. MethodsWe conducted two national inter-laboratory comparisons with optimal sample preparation but different dispatch conditions. We also investigated variations of temperature and time, and their influence on C1-INH. ResultsC1-INH levels showed a significantly wider dispersion under suboptimal transport conditions than under optimal conditions (p < 0.00001). Two putatively healthy patient samples turned out to be pathological. Contrary to our expectations, we found no significant trend in a specific direction when the variables of temperature, time and sample material were combined and varied under realistic conditions. However, the range of variation in [%] functionality was markedly greater in supposedly healthy volunteers. Thus, under experimental conditions we obtained false pathological results that were not far from reality. ConclusionC1- INH determination is crucial for the diagnosis of HAE. Time, temperature, and sample handling have a significant impact on this laboratory value, sometimes leading to incorrect values, inaccurate diagnoses, and inappropriate therapies. This underlines the importance of proper handling of samples. If a patient has ambiguous C1-INH values despite optimized conditions, thus hindering a conclusive diagnosis of HAE, we recommend genetic testing.