Abstract
The article examines the articulation and clarification of the concept of cultural ideology. According to the author’s position, both for describing of ideal “horizons” of social reality and for clarifying the cultural role of ontological beliefs associated with these horizons, the concept of cultural ideology is more successful than the previously used concepts of “garment of ideas” (Ideenkleid) “social representation,” “dominant worldview.” Unlike Heidegger’s concept of the essence of being that is ruling in history, the concept of cultural ideology claims to describe only the subjective attitudes of individuals, who, by a joint cultural activity, constitute an intersubjective space of meanings and actions. However, these attitudes form the foundations of cultural experience that determine the social structure and social being in each specific historical era. In our days, there are signs of the transformations of the foundations of the cultural ideology that originated in the age of Enlightenment and dominated in the society of Modern Times. The evidence of those transformations is a phenomenon of “post-truth.” The denial of the singularity of truth is an evidence of the crisis of the universal mind that is a justifying and legitimizing foundation of sciences and technologies. Moreover, the crisis of the cultural ideology of universal mind endangers not only the science itself but the entire social order (including its values, universal rights and freedoms) that was formed by the belief in the universality of mind.
Highlights
Белокобыльский Александр Владимирович – доктор философских наук, профессор, глава Киевского отделения Украинского института стратегий глобального развития и адаптации
According to the author’s position, both for describing of ideal “horizons” of social reality and for clarifying the cultural role of ontological beliefs associated with these horizons, the concept of cultural ideology is more successful than the previously used concepts of “garment of ideas” (Ideenkleid) “social representation,” “dominant worldview.”
Unlike Heidegger’s concept of the essence of being that is ruling in history, the concept of cultural ideology claims to describe only the subjective attitudes of individuals, who, by a joint cultural activity, constitute an intersubjective space of meanings and actions
Summary
Белокобыльский Александр Владимирович – доктор философских наук, профессор, глава Киевского отделения Украинского института стратегий глобального развития и адаптации. (2019) Кризис идеологии универсального разума как вызов социальной структуре модерна // Философские науки. Что в данном случае Киссинджер имел в виду сугубо политический тип идеологий, как минимум две из которых действительно окрасили ХХ в.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.