Abstract

Purpose This study aims to correlate the clinical signs of keratoconus (KC) which include superficial apical scarring, Fleischer rings, and Vogt striae with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and corneal tomography findings. Patients and methods. A retrospective observational study. 72 consecutive KC patients seen by the senior author over the course of one year were included in this case series. Eyes with pellucid marginal degeneration, postrefractive ectasia, history of a corneal graft, prior corneal collagen cross-linking, intracorneal ring segments or hydrops were excluded from analysis. Subsequently, the final analysis included only treatment-naïve KC eyes with varying degrees of disease severity. Results BSCVA with manifest refraction was 0.5 logMAR higher in eyes with apical scarring (p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, K2 = 64.56 ± 12.89 D versus 49.07 ± 6.61 D, p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, K2 = 64.56 ± 12.89 D versus 49.07 ± 6.61 D, p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, K2 = 64.56 ± 12.89 D versus 49.07 ± 6.61 D, p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, Conclusion The presence of apical scarring and Fleischer rings on biomicroscopy can aid the clinician in making the distinction between severe or long-standing disease (respectively). Apical scarring is a sign of advanced disease and is associated with worse BSCVA and tomography findings. Fleischer rings are markers of intermediate disease and their presence correlates with disease duration.

Highlights

  • Keratoconus (KC) is a chronic progressive thinning of the cornea that results in myopia and irregular astigmatism [1, 2]

  • E collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study, the most extensive study to correlate between corneal clinical findings and keratometry measurements, has shown that corneal scarring, Fleischer rings, and Vogt striae are associated with higher corneal curvatures and advanced disease [3]

  • Since manual keratometry may be less repeatable in KC [6] and does not measure the posterior corneal curvature, this study aims to correlate the presence of specific clinically detected corneal findings in KC, especially superficial apical scarring and Fleischer rings with visual acuity and tomographical indices using contemporary Scheimpflug tomography

Read more

Summary

Research Article

Is study aims to correlate the clinical signs of keratoconus (KC) which include superficial apical scarring, Fleischer rings, and Vogt striae with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and corneal tomography findings. BSCVA with manifest refraction was 0.5 logMAR higher in eyes with apical scarring (p < 0.001). Eyes with apical scarring had worse vision than eyes with Fleischer rings alone (0.43 logMAR higher in the former, p < 0.009). E OR of observing Fleischer rings in KC eyes was 12% per year (p 0.001). E presence of apical scarring and Fleischer rings on biomicroscopy can aid the clinician in making the distinction between severe or long-standing disease (respectively). Apical scarring is a sign of advanced disease and is associated with worse BSCVA and tomography findings. Fleischer rings are markers of intermediate disease and their presence correlates with disease duration

Introduction
Results
Coefficient p value
Apical scarring p value
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call