Abstract
The present study focuses mainly on how ethos is configured in Gregory Nazianzus’s First Theological Oration and how the pre-ethos influences this process. Pierre Bourdieu’s theory on language and symbolic power and Ruth Amossy’s view on ethos at the crossroad of disciplines ground our scientific enterprise. In brief, we analyse Naziasus’s approach of his audience, of his pre-ethos, of the contradictions among different types of habitus and markets (in Bourdieu’s terms) so that he could establish a stable definition of the theological discourse.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
